MPIP: Melanoma Patients Information Page

The MPIP is the oldest and largest community of people affected by melanoma hosted through the Melanoma Research Foundation. It is designed to provide support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. Once you have been touched by melanoma—either as a patient or as a family member or friend of a patient—you become part of a community. It is not a community anyone joins willingly. But if you must be part of this group, you will find no better place to find the tools you need in your journey with this cancer, and the friends who can make that journey more bearable.

The information on the bulletin board is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Expand/ Collapse Topic
Replies By
View Topic
I'm me, not a statistic. Praying to not be one for years yet.

Login or register to post replies.

Anonymous's picture
Replies 10
Last reply 9/25/2014 - 10:06pm

I'm struggling here as my family thinks I need to totally change my diet to avoid a recurrence if melanoma. This was discussed with my oncologist who told my father that I didn't progress to Stage 4 because of diet. It was acknowledged that diet is key to general health and well being. Diet doesn't destroy body's ability or immune system to recognize melanoma cells and destroy them. Though it was highly suggested as much as possible to avoid processed foods.So bascially message was diet is helpful but not necessarily going to help avoid a recurrence. Also, my diet isn't great and it isn't bad. It probably needs to be a little more balanced. Not a ton of processed foods but I do like a cookie or ice cream here or there....

I've researched this some and you find arguements that go either way.....adamant that diet is crucial while I saw MDA says "sugar isn;t cause of cancers" or lead to cancer. So which is it? This is very confusing....

Let's work for better treatments....for a cure!!!!

Login or register to post replies.

BrianP's picture
Replies 10
Last reply 8/27/2014 - 1:30pm

This is a pretty interesting 8 minute panel discussion on checkpoint inhibitor Combination Strategies.

Joe, I think you'll find the discussion interesting on TIL therapy and some discoveries they've made recently on why TIL sometimes works initially but then there are recurrences.

G-Samsa, I looked through the 2014 ASCO abstracts and couldn't find anything relating to the side effects to the lungs you recently mentioned but there is a little discussion to PD-1 side effects in this video that may be what you were referring to. They mention that anti-PD-1 not only blocks PD-L1 but also PD-L2. Apparently PD-L2 is needed to promote homeostasis in organs and prevent pneumonitis in the lungs which can be very dangerous.  This is why they think that anti-PD-L1 is so far having less side effects than anti-PD-1.

The link is to part 4 of a 5 part panel discussion. I haven't watched all the discussions yet but found this one pretty informative.


Login or register to post replies.

Anonymous's picture
Replies 2
Last reply 8/23/2014 - 10:21pm

My mother is a case of melanoma left heel with left inguino pelvic lymphadenopathy. Wide local excision done with lymphnode dissection done on 14/05/14

We are based out of India

Docs did tell us it quite rare. Post surgery, they have opted for wait and watch . The surgery happened in May and we got CT chest and CT whole abdomen (triple phase) done on August 2. CT chest shows no abnormality. However, CT whole abdomen (Triple phase) shows subcm right external iliac node measuring 2.0x .9 cms. Docs have again called us after 6 weeks for follow up on this. I am confused and scared this spreading? How bad is this?

Also, her CBC(Haemogram Complete)-C/71 shows decreased haemoglobin from 12.5 to 11.4 now. Total Leucocyte Count as 13200 (reference range 4000-11500), Monocytes as 8.6 (reference range 2.6-8.5) , MCV 76.3 ( ref range 80-101), MCH 25.0(ref range 26-38).

She is not under any medication right now.

Please suggest how bad is her condition? What is her life expectancy in this case? I am terrified and scared. I love her.

Look forward to hearing back.

God bless you

Login or register to post replies.

I heard the most shocking news imaginable. For the last year my whole town and actually people from all over the country have been rallying around a 4, now 5 year old with metastatic colon cancer only to find out it was all a hoax on her mother's part. The mom was arrested and so far has been charged with felony child endangerment and another felony for giving her cannabis oil. This girl had a Facebook page showing her bald with a feeding tube in her nose. She even had a bucket list so she was told she had cancer and was dying. In just two websites they have received over $7600 not to mention the countless benefits our town has had or just people donating to them. This is so hard to fathom a mother doing this. Riley' s #1 on her bucket list was to meet Ariel at Disney and that was made possible. Her mother would be on Facebook constantly updating on her and even said it had spread and they had stopped chemo. Her father is the manager of our local Walmart and worked a lot so they are saying he didn't know but that just seems crazy. Did he never occumpany his wife to the Dr? If not then shame on him. Personally I think she was drugging her with cannabis oil and it was making the child not feel well and sleep a lot. That's when she would take her picture to post on Facebook. This all was figured out when Riley was to start kindergarten. The school was trying to make a plan for her and her medical records weren't adding up so they called police. I can't imagine what this poor little girl must be thinking. Google Riley slauson.

Login or register to post replies.

Mamasgotsomescara's picture
Replies 2
Last reply 8/23/2014 - 3:46pm
Replies by: Linny, Janner
Hi all. I am 3 months post surgery for stage 0 melanoma on my lower leg. 
I have a apt next week with my dr., but I am nervous about a new freckle I discovered on the bottom of my toe. My dr hasn't checked the soles of my feet in over a year and it didn't dawn on me to check them until recently. The freckle is light brown and white. Should I be worries? I read online it's very rare to have freckles or moles on the soles of the feet.. 

Login or register to post replies.

I am sharing my experience of reduced dosage and then every other day reduced dosage in the hope that it helps others.

A brief history. Melanoma found around 20 years ago through mole on back. Excised. No treatment. 2011 another mole was melanoma. Lung nodules. VAT lung surgery. IL2. Numerous small lung nodules grew extremely slowly and all under 1 mm through 2013. September 2013 2 small brain mets (.2 & .3). Gamma November 2013 worked on those two. January 2014 two more small mets. Gamma February 2014 due to growth of those.

Started TAFINLAR + MEKINIST February 2014 to combat brain and lungs (which since November had grown where now 2 were >1 mm.

For the first 50 days I needed 4 breaks due to shakes and loss of appetite. At that point daily Tafinlar dose was lowered from 300 to 200. By day 75 still having side effects so changed to every other day. Now almost 6 months in still getting results on a reduced, every other day dose.

April brain scan shows significant resolution or non visible mets.

May chest scan shows mets reduced 70%. Dose reduced and then changed to every other day.

July brain shows continued resolution.

August chest shows further 15% reduction.

My message is that not every person must follow the norm. I had a difficult time accepting from my doctor that this was a reasonable dose. I was scared that the low amount of medicine would not work. Turns out she was right.

Login or register to post replies.

Nal64's picture
Replies 9
Last reply 8/23/2014 - 11:53pm

My 40 yr old husband found a lump in his shoulder in January. We believed it to be a muscle knot but when it didn't go away after a few months we were sent to a surgeon.  The general surgeon didn't like that the lump was underneath the muscle and took a needle biopsy that was diagnosed as melanoma. The general surgeon disagreed and sent us to a sarcoma specialist at the University of Chicago.

Our sarcoma specialist performed an incision biopsy to make sure radiation was appropriate for the "sarcoma". We also had a PET scan done that showed no other evidence of disease. The sample came back from the pathologist again as melanoma (but now from a more reputable hospital).

Our sarcoma specialist conferred with a team that included a radiation specialist and melanoma specialist and decided excision without prior radiation was the best course of action. He removed a 3cm x4cm tumor with narrow but clean margins on July 1, 2014 on the side of the neck and top of the shoulder. It was located beneath the trapezius muscle. No lymph nodes were checked because this was considered "metastatic" with an unknown primary.

We then sought the care of a highly regarded melanoma specialist within our advocate hospitals medical network. He says he believes that the PET scan is correct, that this is a "primary melanoma of soft parts which is extreamly rare and cannot be staged because melanoma is staged from the top of the skin down".  This tumor appeared beneith the muscle. We can find no other information on this diagnosis online, as it all leads back to clear cell sarcoma. 

I should also make it clear, this tumor has been tested for every genetic marker there is. It contains NO genetic mutations and a FISH test was performed that completely ruled out clear cell sarcoma. 

The melanoma specialist wants to take a "watch and wait " approach. He fears radiation would do more harm then good in the long run. He said if Yervoy were available to us that he would give it, but that the FDA hasn't approved it for Resected melanoma. 

Yesterday my husband had a follow up with the surgeon who performed the resection. Because I couldn't attend the appointment, I emailed a list of nagging questions I still had. The surgeon was then able to talk to the melanoma specialist (gajewski)  on staff at UofC before my husbands visit. The surgeon said there is no such thing as "primary melanoma of the soft parts" . They believe the PET scan missed something microscopic and want us to see Dr. gajewski who will most likely radiate and get us into a clinical trial where we will either get high or low dose yervoy or IL2.

The melanoma specialist we have been seeing with a watch and wait approach told us he would contact our surgeon twice. He has not. We are in the process of emailing him and getting answers as to why this wasn't done.  

The question becomes: do we get our second opinion at the University of Chicago (where we have pretty much been told by the surgeon what treatment will be) , or do we seek out a "third" -but second to our insurance company- opinion that proves to be a tie-breaker? Is it too late for radiation? Do we fight to get seen at MD Anderson or Sloan-Kettering? I would love another PET scan too, but will not be allowed one for one year following the resection per our insurance company.

Any info you have would be greatly appreciated. We are so confused at this point and don't know who to believe. I have all path reports and any other info needed if it would help someone lead us in the right direction.

Thank you in advance


Login or register to post replies.

bigb0624's picture
Replies 3
Last reply 8/23/2014 - 11:26pm

Now that i have used Zelboraf, with success, and the combo Tafinlar & Mekinist, with some success, my tumors in my liver have showed progression and now my doctor wants me to start Merck's PD-1. Has anyone followed the same course i am taking and were there any side effects to the PD-1?



Login or register to post replies.

Resilient4Life's picture
Replies 2
Last reply 8/21/2014 - 7:39pm
Replies by: Resilient4Life, Janner

This post is a follow up to "Informed Yesterday". My report came in the mail, naturally after business hours. Please decipher.

DIAGNOSIS: Skin (left forehead): Consistent with actinic keratosis, I

Note: No evidence of carcinoma is identified in multiple sections. Only a small amount of dermis is available for the specimen study.

Skin: (left upper arm): Malignant Melanoma, II

Thickness: 0.25 mmm, Clarks Level II, no ulcer or mitosis

Note: Most of the lesion is malignant melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type but it extends focally into the superficial dermis. In situ melanoma extends to the side margins.


Left forehead-6mm atropic pink macule, basal cell carcinoma

Left upper arm-7mm pin and brown macule, basal cell carcinoma


Left forehead coded I: A 0.5cm. specimen is pale tan.

Left upper arm coded II: A 0.5 cm. specimen is pale tan.

James A. Seab, M.D.

My untrained eye sees the words Malignant melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. I thought these were two different things. If the first forehead note says no carcinoma, why does it say in the clinical history basal cell carcinoma? Should I push for a removal of the forehead area as well? Thank you in advance for your replies.

Login or register to post replies.

mary1233's picture
Replies 0

As many others of you have experienced, the removal of lymph nodes can create lymphedema which is a pain in the neck to manage. I had a number of nodes removed in my groin which resulted in lymphedema in one of my legs. Combining that with the chemo induced neuropathy has caused a fair amount of concern.

I was doing all I could: drinking water, wearing a compression hose during the day and compression bandages at night. Fluid still pooled in my ankles and knees causing pain.

Two days ago I read a piece on the Sloan Kettering website about neuropathy and they briefly mentioned MLD - manual lymph drainage. Youtube has videos on how to do self MLD massage. I tried it two nights in a row, and my knee feels so much better.

There are also Youtube videos for arm MLD but I did not watch them.

Hope this helps someone.

Login or register to post replies.

Anonymous's picture
Replies 1
Last reply 8/21/2014 - 8:08am
Replies by: Anonymous



"We may now get more aggressive in the treatment of melanoma that is not deep but has a high mitotic rate. Instead of just cutting it out, we may add in chemotherapy," she said. "So we may change how we evaluate melanomas and how we treat them."

Login or register to post replies.

G-Samsa's picture
Replies 10
Last reply 8/21/2014 - 10:48pm

I thought this might be interesting for others on this path.  I am nearing the final scheduled trial treatments and have had little difficulty tolerating them.  My most recent scan showed, amid all other stable or reduced tumors, two new less defined spots in my lungs.  The Drs. felt that while new melanoma could not be ruled out, it was more likely a reaction to the drugs.  You may have seen that there was an important paper presented at ASCO on the serious side effects to the lungs from the combo (translates to high mortality)  The course of action was to skip treatment and schedule an interim scan (4weeks). It's hard to for me to skip a treatment since I believe  this has been a life raft---you forget how powerful the drugs are and that the things they set in motion can build, and that you sometimes have to let go and hope you can swim.  Don't know whether anyone else has had this experience, so I thought I'd put it out there to stimulate awareness.


Login or register to post replies.

cavsnut's picture
Replies 5
Last reply 8/23/2014 - 11:02pm
Replies by: JerryfromFauq, Anonymous, Colleen66, cavsnut, Bubbles

Hi all...just had a WLE and SLNB yesterday at the James Cancer Center @ Ohio State. It went well , doesn't hurt too bad today...the melanoma was on my calf and had 3 lymphnodes removed from groin for the SLNB.Initially my stage is 2a with the tumor being 2.1mm thick, miotic rate of 1, no regression or ulceration. My question is, if it has spread to the lymphnodes, should I have them all removed? From what I have read if it's only there microscopically is it in my best interest to have them all removed when it could cause more problems for me than taking the chance that the melanoma may not progress past that point? Just thinking ahead I guess...

Login or register to post replies.

DZnDef's picture
Replies 1
Last reply 8/26/2014 - 3:44am
Replies by: rick1981

Hi all,

For those of you interested in learning more about Integrative and Alternative approaches to cancer, there is a free online summit starting on September 2nd.  You would have to give them your email address (yes, you will be added to their mailing list) then you can attend the summit for free.  They make money by having folks sign up for a monthly membership where you can watch/listen to the presentations anytime rather than just the free period.  But you aren't required to be a member to listen during the free period.

I don't seem to be able to add live links on my ipad for some reason, but you can cut and paste the link above if you're interested in the material.

Be well,



Login or register to post replies.