MPIP: Melanoma Patients Information Page

The MPIP is the oldest and largest community of people affected by melanoma hosted through the Melanoma Research Foundation. It is designed to provide support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. Once you have been touched by melanoma—either as a patient or as a family member or friend of a patient—you become part of a community. It is not a community anyone joins willingly. But if you must be part of this group, you will find no better place to find the tools you need in your journey with this cancer, and the friends who can make that journey more bearable.

The information on the bulletin board is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Expand/ Collapse Topic
Replies By
View Topic
Anonymous's picture
Replies 0
After meeting with my dr- this test tested the genetic make-up of my specific melanoma tumor to check the likelihood of reoccurrence. It came back that mine is highly likely. Do any of you know of a test that is valid like this? I posted the link in my last post- it is skinmelanoma. do any of you know of a test like his that is valid? Because now I am scared to death. 
Thanks for all your insight.

Login or register to post replies.

Subject: Viagra Melanoma Lawsuits
Viagra Melanoma Lawsuits

Viagra has been linked to nearly a doubling of melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer, in men who used the erectile dysfunction medication, according to a recent study.

If you or a loved one suffered melanoma after using Viagra, you should contact a Viagra attorney for a free and confidential review of a potential Viagra lawsuit.

Kline & Specter, P.C., with more than 30 lawyers, several of whom are also highly skilled medical doctors, has the experience and expertise to litigate pharmaceutical injury cases. The firm was a key player in the $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement and has won large settlements in lawsuits involving medications.

Nearly 10,000 people die each year of melanomoa, with some 76,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Two-thirds of those who die are men.

The Viagra study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, found that men who took Viagra were 84 percent more likely to develop melanoma. The study, whose subjects included 26,000 men with an average age of 65, showed an increase in melanoma among Viagra users even when the findings were adjusted to take into account other variables, such as family history of skin cancer and exposure to UV rays.

One author of the study, Dr. Abrar Qureshi, chairman of the dermatology department at Brown University’s medical school, was quoted as saying that Viagra may increase the risk of melanoma because it affects the same genetic pathway that allows skin cancer to become more invasive.


Live 4 today. Thank God for all he has done for us. Looking forward to enjoying tomorrow.

Login or register to post replies.

Anonymous's picture
Replies 2
Last reply 7/2/2014 - 9:22am
Replies by: SBeattie, BrianP

I erroneously scheduled an out of town vacation over a day when I would normally get my every two week infusion of well, we're not sure, in trail of ipi x4 plus nivo x4 then every two weeks; nivo only; ipi only followed by placebo...had to miss one infusion in April due to endocrinopathy side effect...trial folk say postponing upcoming infusion by one week won't affect response...anyone out there have any input? would you change vacation dates? scans have shown shrinkage in lung mets; fortunately no other organs involved...thanks so much to ALL OF YOU!!!


Login or register to post replies.

Merck announced yesterday that pembro has officially been accepted into and started the approval process in the EU by their regulating body:
Merck’s Investigational Anti-PD-1 Antibody, Pembrolizumab, Under Regulatory Review in Europe for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma - MarketWatch

Login or register to post replies.

ScaredV's picture
Replies 11
Last reply 7/6/2014 - 7:50pm
Replies by: brittanyx, ScaredV, Anonymous, AmandaLivingston, Janner, Gene_S

Hello everyone,

I'm sad to be posting here, but hoping to find some support and answers.

My fiance was diagnosed with melanoma in April.  The lesion was 2x2cm and it was on his jawline.  It looked like a patch of eczema. Long story short, he had this spot on his face for 5 years, we were told it was a fungal infection, he took all sorts of creams for it, it didn't go away.  Finially a dermatologist decided to biopsy it and it turned out to be melanoma.  Since it was a large spot, only part of it was biopsied and we were told it was only .34mm.  

He had the WLE surgery preformed but they did not check lymph nodes at that time due to the fact that they thought it was only .34mm.  After the surgery, we found out at it's deepest point it was actually 1.23mm with a mitotic rate of 2 (this was only at the deepest point,  there were all different depths and some areas were in situ).  The surgery was a success and the margins were clear.  The surgeon who did the WLE did not want to test his lymph nodes but his dermatologist has decided he does want to test the lymph nodes so we will be meeting with a second surgeon in the next few weeks.  

This whole experience has caused extreme anxiety for me.  I am so worried about him and just want him to be ok.  I do have a few questions that I'm hoping you all can help me with.

The first question is, why does one doctor want to go ahead and test the lymph nodes and one does not? What is the best course of action to take now?  I realize that because he already had surgery, the lymph node testing is not as accurate.  

Are there any risks we should know about when testing the lymph nodes?  

My final and most important question is considering this new information and the location of the melanoma, what are the chances that this has spread to the lymph nodes?  I am so terrified of hearing the results of this and I am unsure what the chances are that this may have spread.  I realize every case is different but if anyone has any numbers or experiences they could share, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you so much

Login or register to post replies.

jualonso's picture
Replies 2
Last reply 7/3/2014 - 10:45am
Replies by: jualonso, leslieann79

Hi guys,

I have read in many places that is possible that fail in inhibitors could affect to response in inmunotheraphys, what is your opinion?

Did someone stop from inhibitors once he reduce tumors, go into inmunotheraphy and if failed, back again to braf/mek with succes?


Thanks to all of you.

All togheter we will beat the Beast

Login or register to post replies.

Anonymous's picture
Replies 2
Last reply 7/1/2014 - 2:13pm
Replies by: Ninniditti, Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
Replies 0



 Contact: Nuria Noriega
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO)

CNIO researchers discover more than 40 melanoma-specific genes that determine aggressiveness

The results of the study could help to determine the development of metastasis in patients suffering from the disease

Researchers from the Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) have discovered more than 40 genes that predict the level of aggressiveness of melanoma and that distinguish it from other cancers with a poor prognosis. The discovery, published in Cancer Cell, will help to identify unique aspects of melanoma that could contribute to determine the risk of developing metastasis in patients with this disease. This study is relevant because it explains why a drug, also described by CNIO, is being used to selectively attack the melanoma tumour cells. Melanoma is one of the worst, most metastatic cancers known today.

What is the function of these genes? Strangely, the factors that are increased in melanoma share a common mechanism: the formation of vesicles called endosomes.

Endosomes are machinery that tumour cells, via a process called endocytosis, can use to incorporate components into their environment and obtain energy by degrading them via autodigestion or autophagy. Autophagy is also used for self-cleaning to eliminate other proteins as well as damaged or unneeded cellular components.

Among all the genes that control endocytosis, the authors of the study focused specifically on one, called RAB7; this gene is highly expressed in melanoma cells. After more than six years of research, the research team led by María Soengas, head of CNIO's Melanoma Group, showed that RAB7 acts as an orchestra director, determining the fate of melanoma cells: at high concentrations of RAB7, cellular autodigestion is very active, and this allows tumour cells to obtain energy, prevent the accumulation of toxic components and thus divide and proliferate; when RAB7 is reduced, cells use endosomes to recycle metastatic proteins, favouring their dispersal throughout the body.

Defining "the key to the fate of the tumour cell", as Soengas says, is just one of many new aspects of melanoma uncovered by this study. "Finding which mechanisms determine why melanoma is so aggressive is very complex because more than 80,000 mutations have been described for this tumour", says Direna-Alonso Curbelo, the article's first author.

This study is also relevant for clinical work. One application is the prognosis of the melanoma: the authors show in tumour biopsies that the amount of RAB7 in a cutaneous tumour defines the risk of developing metastasis. "This study opens avenues for the potential use of proteins that control vesicles and regulate autophagy as novel markers of patient survival", says Soengas.

Furthermore, these results help to understand the mechanism of action of a compound that, as the group discovered in 2009, is lethal in melanoma cells as well as in other tumour cells. This RNA-based nanoparticle compound kills the cells by acting on the formation of vesicles.

"We knew how our nanoparticles act inside tumour cells, but not how they selectively incorporate inside the cells", says Soengas. The size of these molecules requires cells to form endosomes in order to be able to trap the compound. This study demonstrates that this endosome formation (via RAB7) is very active in tumour cells but not in normal cells. Normal cells, therefore, do not incorporate RNA nanoparticles, reducing the risk of toxic effects.

The work published in Cancer Cell complements previous research efforts from the CNIO Melanoma Group, which could lead to the development of novel drugs that selectively target the mechanism of cell autodigestion as a potential therapeutic strategy.

This has been a multidisciplinary study in which many new computational techniques have been used to process large amounts of genomic data. CNIO's Bioinformatics Unit has been key in comparing 900 cell lines derived from up to 35 tumour types in order to identify unique aspects of melanoma. On the other hand, CNIO's Molecular Imaging Unit has made it possible to analyse vesicle formation mechanisms at high resolution and in real-time.

The study's authors have worked alongside researchers from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, as well as with dermatologists and pathologists from the hospital 12 de Octubre in Madrid, and experts in the field of melanoma diagnosis and treatment.

This work has been funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, the National Institute of Health Carlos III, the Melanoma Research Foundation, the American Cancer Society, the Fundación Mutua Madrileña and the Fundación "La Caixa".


Reference article:

Alonso-Curbelo et al., RAB7 Controls Melanoma Progression by Exploiting a Lineage-Specific Wiring of the Endo- lysosomal Pathway, Cancer Cell (2014)

Login or register to post replies.

Anonymous's picture
Replies 5
Last reply 7/1/2014 - 4:36pm
Replies by: adriana cooper, Ginger8888, Anonymous, Julie in SoCal

I've been on an Ipi 3mg/kg trial for three weeks now (for stage III, post-surgery adjuvant), but so far I've not felt any different. How long did it take for you? What side effects did you get?

I heard getting white hairs is a good sign so I'm hoping to see those... especially since I've no measurable tumors so there's no other way to know if it's working.

Login or register to post replies.

Colleen66's picture
Replies 2
Last reply 6/29/2014 - 4:52pm

I'm really upset and anxious.  My history is up to day with the high points.  I've been stalble over a year and a half after 4 weeks HD INF.  This May I got some kind of mystery virus. and acquired two areas on eith side of my neck of hyperpigmentation.  Local Doc says rash from sun/alergies...whatever.  It dosnt itch, not inflammed.  then a couple more weeks and I am developing Vitiligo.  Derm says, yup, thats what you got.  Told him about this neck pigment thing again. He just gives me a sterioid cream.  I am so done with this local Derm.  When I go in for a skin check he says...what do you want me to look at....(I could scream....all the freaking changes my skin is going thru)  If I don't point something out he just glosses of everything.  My skin has changed more since this mystery virus than in my whole lifetime.

(Breathing)  Ok.  I also recall during my INF treatment I had to see the Eye Doc, I was having a side efffect of swelling, sensativity and migraines in the eye.  At that time I had pigment changes to the back of the retina.  (Vitiligo?)  I'm getting more inflamation, pain and migrains in my eye again.  All head pain goes to this eye, I hate it.  I'm clalling Monday for an appointed with her.

So I sent an email to my Medical Oncolgist this morning asking for guidance.  I explained just as I have with you guys.  Asking to point me to a Derm who has experience with all of the issues or if they wanted to see me.  

Local Derm is suggesting sterioid treatments and sun therapy crap and I'm like.....HEY  why would I want it to stop if it might possibly help the melanoma situation.  ugh.  I'v read all the published material about this and just get more confusted as to any recommened treatment with these things going on or not treatment at all or just become entirely anxiety ridden and start wearing gloves in the summer to my new skin doesn't burn.

Sorry guys, I'm just lost with these developments and even if it means anything and anything should be down.  I'm getting more depressed by the day just watching these white patches creep bigger.  I've noticied its creeping down my forhead now and out from my ears.  It started on the right hand with is a mess now and the lef hand is looking like it will match.  I'm very fair skinned so I think I notice it more than any one else would.

I just wonder if all this is happening on the outside if anything is happening on the inside too.  This is why I jump on the anxiety train.

Should hear about some guidance tomorrow I hope.  Trying to keep my PMA but its hard some times.

I don't even think I have any questions,  I don't even know if that all made sense,  Just wanted someone to know what I'm goin thru and if there is any advice out there.

Thanks Colleen



Login or register to post replies.

ocelot's picture
Replies 5
Last reply 7/1/2014 - 1:00am

Hello everyone, 


I'm back with what is probably only the beginning of the newbie questions.

The basics: fiancé diagnosed with melanoma last week. Breslow thickness 1.15 mm, Clark level 3/4, mitotic rate 1, no ulceration, melanoma excised with clear (but very narrow) margins, abdominal ultrasound, chest x-ray and bloodwork all clear. First appointment with melanoma specialist the week after next. 

We anticipate that the next step is the wide local excision and the sentinel lymph node biopsy. We are really hoping that the SNB comes back negative.  If it doesn't, I guess we start looking at treatment options.

If it is negative, however, are there other scans or imaging technologies we should be pushing for to ensure that there really is no melanoma elsewhere in the body? I've read about PET and MRI scans being used in more advanced cases, but it sounds like for stage 1 melanomas, if the SNB is negative, doctors usually say "congratulations" and send you home. However, fiancé is concerned that the SNB might miss some signs of spread. Would it be worthwhile to push for further scanning (in addition to the already-completed chest x-Ray and ultrasound), or would that be excessive? (I should add that we're in Canada so insurance coverage or costs are not an issue).

Thanks  in advance for any ideas you might have. 

Login or register to post replies.

soccerchick's picture
Replies 1
Last reply 6/28/2014 - 6:14pm
Replies by: BrianP

I've posted here a few times, so I had a mastectomy march 31 the surgeon removed a  melanoma tumor that was 7 x 4 inches, I had had a breast implant about 24 years ago that was flattened like a pancake, my doc had to peal it off my muscle wall and believe it or not there was melonoma cells on the implant, I have benn treated and MDAnderson for almost 3 years and they have managed to keep in contained thus far, I've tried Ipi 7 months of chemo with a braf inhibitor , il2 , a Mek and braf inhibitor when the tumor started growing like a weed, surgeon has always been reluctant to do another surgery, 3 but the tumor was causing too much pain, the surgeon was able to close me, but of course a ton of tissue was removed, all do my margins were not clear, spent weeks with the worst pain of my life but was finally able to get some relief with a thoracic nerve blocks, so finally I was able to enroll in the compassionate part of the anti pd1, Mek 3475 I think, and was the 1st patient to receive it at mad, so I have a tumor now under my  right armpit, my mastectomy and complete lymph node reval almost 3 years ago was on my left side, I also have a lump in my left neck and lo and behold I just found a big lump on my left side towards my back, getting ready to have 3rd dose of pd1 next week and scans after 4th dies, so far have manged to keep it mostly in lymph system and sub q so far except last scanshowed a few spots on the pleura of my lung, I'm hanging in there but am starting to feel like my option if this one doesn't work are getting slim, but hanging on and continuing to work the best that I can! Mitotic rate 13, which I hear is high dang it!

Login or register to post replies.

Hi there - my husband was diagnosed stage 4 on Tuesday with several smalle tumors in his a liver. His primarily melanoma was on his scalp and successfully removed along with a lymph node which came up clean. He is starting immunotherapy next week.

They gave us a 30 page packet of Yervoy side effects so it's hard to determine which we should actually expect and plan for. I've read about joint pain on here so believe that can be a real issue. My husband is 27 and healthy aside from all this and being treated at UCSF. 

Also I have the same questions about PD-L1 and MEK which  is the clinical trial he'll get into if we don't see immediate results from the Vervoy.  Any insight is much appreciated!

Login or register to post replies.

tcell's picture
Replies 4
Last reply 6/30/2014 - 11:37pm

Hi all,

would appreciate any kind of info on the following:

Since I startred te taf / mek combo in February when I had lots of mets and rather high levels of s-100, the marker has constantly gone down. Scans a month ago showed considerable shrinkage of all mets.

I had another appointment at the clinic this week and just got a call that s-100 has now gone up and is slightly above the upper limit. They say not to worry as this could also be caused by the decay of tumor cells Obviously it should be enough that I come again for my next monthly appointment.

Do any of the stage IV folks have experience with S-100 and that it could suddenly go up and then down again without any need to worry?



Login or register to post replies.

dhrahn's picture
Replies 3
Last reply 6/28/2014 - 6:45pm

It all happened so fast.  After the second infusion of PD1 they have decided that my husband Dave is progressing to rapidly to continue.  It has moved to his spine causing a compression fracture in vertebrea, also to pelvis and liver.  It is surreal.  As christians our faith is what carrying us through.  We know God has a plan and he will guide and give us peace during this very challenging time.  We are going to try to go back on zelboraf (which we have done) and add Mek inhibitor to see if it may add any time and comfort.  They have said it may be 2 weeks it may be 2 months.  I appreciate all the information and people that have shared there stories and lives.  What a blessing it has been.  God bless you all!  May you all have peace during these trying times.

Dave & Holly Rahn

Login or register to post replies.